Chloe Paquet vs Darya Astakhova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Oct at 07:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Paquet vs D. Astakhova

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paquet 2 - 0 Astakhova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Chloe Paquet winning 4 and Darya Astakhova winning 0. The last match between Chloe Paquet and Darya Astakhova was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 25-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Chloe Paquet getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paquet | 2 |
| Astakhova | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(10-25-25)
(R2) W60 Astana(03-09-23)
C. Paquet vs D. Astakhova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $452,820 | Career Prize Money | $72,000 |
| 50.59% (429-419) | Career Total W/L | 65.95% (215-111) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Paquet vs D. Astakhova Match Preview:
- In terms of recent form, Chloe Paquet has the upper hand on second serve performance, winning 41.01% of points, compared to Darya Astakhova's 36.43%. Why does this matter? Strong second serve efficiency often translates to match wins.
- When examining return game statistics, Paquet also outshines by winning 53.89% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Astakhova manages 50.87%. However, Astakhova is marginally better on first serve returns at 37.33% compared to Paquet's 35.36%.
- Under pressure, Paquet saves 49.24% of breakpoints, showing resilience. Astakhova's performance is slightly lower with 44.41%, indicating she might struggle to convert crucial points.
- Considering the last year's performance, Astakhova exhibits a better match win rate of 60.61%, a stark contrast to Paquet's 35.85%. Can this overall performance be a key indicator? It certainly plays a pivotal role.
- Both players display their best career surface performance on clay, each with a win percentage of 53%. Notably, both have relatively poor grass court performances, with Astakhova having a 0% win rate.
- At the ITF level, Paquet and Astakhova have participated largely in $10K+ tournaments. However, Astakhova has a higher win rate at 59.09% against Paquet's 50.00%, suggesting better form in similarly leveled tournaments.
- When looking at head-to-head performance, Paquet has claimed victory in their only matchup to date, winning both sets played. Is her past win an indication of future success? It's a positive sign.
- Paquet has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 168.91, while Astakhova has played against players ranked around 330.88. Does playing against tougher opponents refine Paquet's game? It enhances her competitive edge.
- If the upcoming match goes into a deciding set, Astakhova's 60% win rate in such circumstances gives her a notable advantage over Paquet's 23%.
Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance data, Chloe Paquet shows stronger second serve efficiency and a superior ability to save breakpoints. These aspects are vital in predicting match outcomes as they highlight a player's ability to hold her serve under pressure.
Despite Darya Astakhova's stronger overall match win rate over the past year and better performance in deciding sets, the quality of opponents faced by Paquet, averaging a higher ranking, suggests more challenging and diverse match experiences.
Moreover, given Paquet's positive prior head-to-head result against Astakhova, she seems to hold a competitive psychological edge. Factoring in these statistical insights, Chloe Paquet is likely the favorite to win the upcoming match.
Chloe Paquet vs Darya Astakhova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Paquet vs D. Astakhova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 14 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:37:26 | Average Match Time | 1:37:26 |
| 56% (73/131) | 1st Serve % | 67% (87/129) |
| 74% (54/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (48/87) |
| 48% (28/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 50% (65/129) | Return Points Win % | 37% (49/131) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Paquet Recent Matches Played
D. Astakhova Recent Matches Played

C. Paquet vs D. Astakhova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.59% (429/419) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.95% (215/111) |
| 51.40% (1012/957) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.23% (453/275) |
| 50.98% (9239/8885) | Games Win/Loss | 55.74% (3608/2865) |
| 47.83% (99/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.69% (42/25) |
| 52.63% (250/225) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.13% (159/71) |
| 49.66% (74/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (14/14) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 2057 | Aces Total | 287 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2941 | Total Double Faults | 924 |
| 1:14:17 | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 484.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 455.14 |
| 59% (25227/42536) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12681/19779) |
| 64% (16161/25227) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7567/12681) |
| 44% (7660/17309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3255/7098) |
| 45% (2284/5057) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1493/2919) |
| 44% (19107/43126) | Return Points Win % | 50% (10095/20305) |
| 29.27% (12/29) | Slam W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 15.38% (2/11) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.67% (45/63) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 53.19% (275/242) | Challenger W/L | 62.56% (127/76) |
| 56.21% (95/74) | Futures W/L | 76.32% (87/27) |
| 51% (424/836) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (206/313) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (91/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (23/46) |
| 44% (119/273) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (55/88) |
| 80% (455/366) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (200/186) |
| 19% (455/88) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (200/14) |
| 16% (393/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (126/28) |